Nvidia Gtx 1070 Vs 1660 Super
Cost at present 435$ Games supported 99% Price now 303$ Games supported 97% Comparison of graphics bill of fare architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for coin To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, simply for precise assessment you lot accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Notation that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a time to come computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, passenger vehicle, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared role of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise but for desktop reference ones (and so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will bear witness useful if you need some particular engineering science for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming criterion performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if y'all observe some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix issues quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions nine, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with ii scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located inside a ocean cavern, the other displaying a space armada attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in Apr 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is at present recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 criterion past Futuremark. It used iv tests based on 2 scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken send, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Dark Raid. Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery animal seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Criterion coverage: fourteen% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping. Benchmark coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, office of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure out entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX xi feature level 9 to display a battle between 2 infinite fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Dark Raid. Criterion coverage: 8% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API past NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 5% This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. Benchmark coverage: two% This function of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games. Benchmark coverage: 1% Cryptocurrency mining functioning of GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Unremarkably measured in megahashes per second. Let'southward see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across unlike resolutions: +1.i% −1.ane% −46.7% +46.seven% +45.4% −45.iv% −3.5% +three.5% −48.9% +48.9% +1% −ane% +4.nine% −4.9% −11.vi% +eleven.6% −160% +160% −95.6% +95.6% +3.9% −3.ix% −4.two% +four.2% −84.4% +84.four% +4.1% −4.one% −6.7% +vi.seven% +43.4% −43.4% +4.iv% −4.iv% −17.8% +17.8% +two% −2% +v.2% −5.ii% −xi.6% +11.6% −116% +116% −44.4% +44.four% +17% −17% +0% +0% −2.4% +2.4% +10.1% −10.1% −57.8% +57.viii% +7.8% −vii.viii% +2.3% −2.3% +39% −39% −17.eight% +17.8% −ii.ii% +2.ii% +4.6% −iv.6% −xiii.8% +13.viii% +five% −5% +45.ii% −45.ii% +5.1% −five.i% −35.6% +35.6% +two.three% −2.three% +18.eight% −18.8% +0% +0% −one.9% +one.nine% +12.5% −12.v% +32.4% −32.4% +twoscore% −40% +73.1% −73.ane% +6.3% −vi.three% +nine.2% −9.ii% −half dozen.3% +6.iii% +87.5% −87.v% +6.3% −6.iii% +xl.6% −forty.6% +87.5% −87.5% +9.5% −nine.5% −139% +139% +0% +0% +vii.5% −vii.five% +viii.three% −8.3% +150% −150% +25% −25% +309% −309% +vi.1% −6.1% +8.six% −8.6% −3.8% +3.8% +275% −275% Technical Metropolis couldn't make up one's mind between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super The differences in performance seem likewise pocket-sized. Should you all the same have questions concerning option betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply. Do y'all think we are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Similar" button nearly your favorite graphics carte du jour. The nearest GeForce GTX 1070'southward AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 56, which is faster by i% and higher by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070: The nearest GeForce GTX 1660 Super's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 56, which is faster by seven% and higher past 7 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Super: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here y'all tin see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 on a calibration of 1 to 5: Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5: Here yous can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an fault or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1070 vs 1660 Super
General info
Place in functioning rating 92 98 Value for money 36.67 73.26 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU lawmaking proper noun Pascal GP104 Turing TU116 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release engagement half-dozen May 2016 (6 years ago) 29 October 2019 (2 years agone) Launch price (MSRP) $379 $229 Price at present $435 (1.1x MSRP) $303 (i.3x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 1408 CUDA cores 1920 no data Core clock speed 1506 MHz 1530 MHz Boost clock speed 1683 MHz 1785 MHz Number of transistors 7,200 million 6,600 meg Manufacturing process technology xvi nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt Maximum GPU temperature 94 °C no data Texture fill rate 202.0 157.1 Floating-bespeak operation vi,463 gflops no information Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Autobus support PCIe 3.0 no data Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe iii.0 x16 Length ten.5" (26.7 cm) 229 mm Height four.376" (eleven.1 cm) no data Width 2-slot ii-slot Recommended system ability (PSU) 500 Watt no information Supplementary power connectors 8-pin 1x viii-pivot SLI options + no data Retentivity
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount viii GB 6 GB Memory coach width 256 Bit 192 Scrap Memory clock speed 8 GB/southward 14000 MHz Memory bandwidth 256 GB/s 336.0 GB/southward Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors DP 1.42, HDMI ii.0b, Dual Link-DVI 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort Multi monitor support + no data HDMI + + HDCP no data + G-SYNC support + + Technologies
GPU Boost iii.0 no data VR Ready + no data NVENC no information + Ansel + + API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1) Shader Model 6.4 half-dozen.5 OpenGL 4.v 4.6 OpenCL ane.2 ane.2 Vulkan + one.ii.131 CUDA + vii.5 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 832 Mh/south no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 2.83 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 28.69 Mh/s no data Siacoin / SC (Sia) 1.75 Gh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.65 kh/southward no data Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 435.21 Sol/s no data Gaming performance
Full Hard disk 118 98 1440p 69 61 4K 48 36 Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 45−l 77 Total Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 89 88 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 66 Battleground 5 141 97 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 113 117 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 67 Far Weep 5 106 105 Far Cry New Dawn 107 102 Forza Horizon iv 129 144 Hitman 3 45−50 117 Horizon Cipher Dawn 45−50 88 Ruddy Dead Redemption ii 80 77 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 96 100 Lookout man Dogs: Legion 45−50 83 Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76 73 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 48 Battleground five 119 83 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 94 90 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 53 Far Cry 5 100 98 Far Weep New Dawn 101 96 Forza Horizon 4 121 135 Hitman 3 45−50 97 Horizon Zero Dawn 45−fifty 65 Metro Exodus 62 53 Red Expressionless Redemption 2 43 43 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83 85 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 120 109 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−fifty 71 Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 55 51 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 44 Battlefield v 107 77 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 53 Far Cry 5 90 92 Far Cry New Dawn 91 87 Forza Horizon 4 94 107 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 63 60 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−fifty 31 1440p
High Preset
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62 59 Hitman 3 45−50 61 Horizon Nil Dawn 45−fifty 44 Metro Exodus 38 32 Red Dead Redemption 2 27 27 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52 53 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 45 40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 34 Battlefield 5 84 60 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 26 Far Cry v 68 64 Far Cry New Dawn 71 65 Forza Horizon four 79 84 Sentinel Dogs: Legion 45−50 24 4K
High Preset
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34 32 Hitman 3 45−50 32 Horizon Nada Dawn 45−50 24 Metro Exodus 23 21 Cerise Dead Redemption 2 xviii forty−45 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26 26 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 40 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey 26 24 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 eighteen Battlefield five 45 36 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 11 Far Cry 5 35 33 Far Weep New Dawn 38 35 Forza Horizon 4 52 54 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 12 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 45.12 42.68 Novelty 6 May 2016 29 Oct 2019 Cost $379 $229 Memory bus width 256 192 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 1408 Memory bandwidth 256 336 Bit lithography 16 nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 past AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Super past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1070-vs-GeForce-GTX-1660-Super
0 Response to "Nvidia Gtx 1070 Vs 1660 Super"
Post a Comment